<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EBM and industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.journalclub.org/2004/10/29/n12/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.journalclub.org/2004/10/29/n12</link>
	<description>Comments on the medical literature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:30:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A MD</title>
		<link>http://www.journalclub.org/2004/10/29/n12/comment-page-1#comment-2419</link>
		<dc:creator>A MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2005 11:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journalclub.org/2004/10/29/n12#comment-2419</guid>
		<description>Dude.

It&#039;s easy to lie with statistics.

It&#039;s also far easier to lie without them.

PS. The best stance to take re: Big PhRMA is that proposed by &lt;a Href=&quot;http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2005/05/is-adversary-model-answer.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lee Green MD MPH&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to lie with statistics.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also far easier to lie without them.</p>
<p>PS. The best stance to take re: Big PhRMA is that proposed by <a Href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2005/05/is-adversary-model-answer.html" rel="nofollow">Lee Green MD MPH</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjmd</title>
		<link>http://www.journalclub.org/2004/10/29/n12/comment-page-1#comment-2270</link>
		<dc:creator>mjmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 12:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journalclub.org/2004/10/29/n12#comment-2270</guid>
		<description>Very apropos this post is an &lt;a href=&quot;http://medrants.com/archives/2005/04/21/pharmaceutical-ghost-writing/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;item&lt;/a&gt; posted on DB&#039;s medical rants on April 21 about pharmaceutical information companies planting articles in the medical literature.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very apropos this post is an <a href="http://medrants.com/archives/2005/04/21/pharmaceutical-ghost-writing/" rel="nofollow">item</a> posted on DB&#8217;s medical rants on April 21 about pharmaceutical information companies planting articles in the medical literature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjmd</title>
		<link>http://www.journalclub.org/2004/10/29/n12/comment-page-1#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>mjmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 17:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journalclub.org/2004/10/29/n12#comment-134</guid>
		<description>If we demand data, and the pharmaceutical companies deliver that data, why am I criticizing them?

My point is really more about EBM than about the pharmaceuticals.  What I&#039;m saying is that EBM is not a magic bullet, and drug companies can adapt quite well to it, thank you.

I don&#039;t want to get into the attack/defend pharmaceutical companies thing, here.  I just think that proponents of EBM sometimes tout it as almost a magic potion.  It&#039;s not.  As the saying goes, &quot;lies, damn lies and statistics&quot;.  Statistics aren&#039;t lies, but they&#039;re not a guarantee of the unvarnished truth, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we demand data, and the pharmaceutical companies deliver that data, why am I criticizing them?</p>
<p>My point is really more about EBM than about the pharmaceuticals.  What I&#8217;m saying is that EBM is not a magic bullet, and drug companies can adapt quite well to it, thank you.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to get into the attack/defend pharmaceutical companies thing, here.  I just think that proponents of EBM sometimes tout it as almost a magic potion.  It&#8217;s not.  As the saying goes, &#8220;lies, damn lies and statistics&#8221;.  Statistics aren&#8217;t lies, but they&#8217;re not a guarantee of the unvarnished truth, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.journalclub.org/2004/10/29/n12/comment-page-1#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journalclub.org/2004/10/29/n12#comment-131</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I understand the implication here.  If EBT is designed to weed out hype, and if the pharmaceutical companies are now using it to promote their products, does it not therefore follow that the data they are putting forth means that their communications are accurate?  I&#039;m not defending the industry as a whole, but aren&#039;t they the ones that make the drugs that save patients&#039; lives?  Must we assume that everything they touch is tainted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I understand the implication here.  If EBT is designed to weed out hype, and if the pharmaceutical companies are now using it to promote their products, does it not therefore follow that the data they are putting forth means that their communications are accurate?  I&#8217;m not defending the industry as a whole, but aren&#8217;t they the ones that make the drugs that save patients&#8217; lives?  Must we assume that everything they touch is tainted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antifaust</title>
		<link>http://www.journalclub.org/2004/10/29/n12/comment-page-1#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>antifaust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 00:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journalclub.org/2004/10/29/n12#comment-45</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;links for 2004-11-14&lt;/strong&gt;
 EBM and Industry This post reminds us that Evidence Based Medicine can also be used as a tool by the pharmaceutical industry. (categories: EBM)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>links for 2004-11-14</strong><br />
 EBM and Industry This post reminds us that Evidence Based Medicine can also be used as a tool by the pharmaceutical industry. (categories: EBM)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
