http://www.journalclub.org/2005/02/04/n55 Comments on the medical literature Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:30:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://www.journalclub.org/2005/02/04/n55/comment-page-1#comment-2127 Nick Tue, 26 Apr 2005 02:11:10 +0000 http://www.journalclub.org/2005/02/04/n55#comment-2127 Maybe this has to do with those pilots who fly along as passengers, for the first leg of the trip? Eight hours before "flying" (ie taking over) could then, in fact, be a shorter duration than 8h before take-off (ie, the start of the first leg). Maybe this has to do with those pilots who fly along as passengers, for the first leg of the trip? Eight hours before “flying” (ie taking over) could then, in fact, be a shorter duration than 8h before take-off (ie, the start of the first leg).

]]> http://www.journalclub.org/2005/02/04/n55/comment-page-1#comment-871 neeraj manikath Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:24:29 +0000 http://www.journalclub.org/2005/02/04/n55#comment-871 ya you are right i too noticed it while reading, No drinking within 8h of take-off is stricter than not flying for at least 8h after drinking so i think it should be No drinking within 8h of prrof reading is better than not proof reading for at least 8h after drinking bye love nrm ya you are right
i too noticed it while reading, No drinking within 8h of take-off is stricter than not flying for at least 8h after drinking
so i think it should be No drinking within 8h of prrof reading is better than not proof reading for at least 8h after drinking
bye
love nrm

]]> http://www.journalclub.org/2005/02/04/n55/comment-page-1#comment-866 garden girl Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:49:47 +0000 http://www.journalclub.org/2005/02/04/n55#comment-866 Perhaps the difference is in how that rule is stated and enforced rather than in the actual time limit which is the same. According to your summary, the UK rule states "aren't meant to..." meaning shouldn't whereas the US rule states can't meaning aren't allowed which is, in fact, a stricter governance. Then again it could be, as you suggest, an error at the Editorial level of the Lancet. Perhaps the difference is in how that rule is stated and enforced rather than in the actual time limit which is the same. According to your summary, the UK rule states “aren’t meant to…” meaning shouldn’t whereas the US rule states can’t meaning aren’t allowed which is, in fact, a stricter governance. Then again it could be, as you suggest, an error at the Editorial level of the Lancet.

]]>